Sunday, June 15, 2025

Creating liberating content

Choose your language

hello@global-herald.net

David Beckham receives special...

David Beckham is expected to receive a knighthood in King Charles' Birthday...

Iran, Israel exchange missiles,...

Iran and Israel have exchanged ballistic missiles and drone strikes in the...

Bill O’Reilly Column: The...

It is likely over for the Islamic terrorists in Iran but they...

Severe weather returns to...

Multiple rounds of severe weather are forecast...
HomeEconomyThe Brazilian Election...

The Brazilian Election and Latin America’s Democratic/Authoritarian Cycles — Dr. Judith Teichman


The end of the commodity boom and a growing sentiment of economic insecurity gave the PT’s detractors the opportunity to rally opposition against the regime. Much of this opposition revolved around the issue of corruption, which was widespread, including among PT politicians. However, corruption, as I point out in an earlier post, is, among other things, a symptom of the lack of a political settlement insofar as it secures the quiescence of an otherwise recalcitrant private sector. 

For the commodity boom/social democratic years to have had an enduring positive impact on social welfare, a cross-societal consensus on the regime’s social justice goals was necessary. Business and middle class groups, and more privileged sectors of the working class, would have to make redistributive concessions. A strategy for employment generation in (new) productive activities was also required—not something that a business class so closely attuned to neoliberalism was likely to give strong support to.  While it is certainly true that even had there been a redistributive settlement the commodity downturn would have created political difficulties for the regime, the consequences would not likely have been as dire as they currently are. 

The Commodity Boom made a Redistributive Settlement and Structural Transformation Unnecessary

The commodity boom insulated the PT regime from the necessity of a redistributive settlement and basic changes in productive structure. Indeed, Brazil and other Latin American countries became ever more dependent on commodity exports as a consequence of the recent boom. Tough discussions about tax reform and other redistributive measures could be avoided. Interventionist measures encouraging investment and export diversification could also be sidestepped, an almost necessary choice given the private sector’s aversion to state intervention in the economy. Meanwhile, the boom did make available the resources for expanded government spending on social programs—but this was only a viable strategy for social improvement while the commodity boom lasted. 



Source link

Get notified whenever we post something new!

spot_img

Create a website from scratch

Just drag and drop elements in a page to get started with Newspaper Theme.

Continue reading

David Beckham receives special Country Life ‘Birthday Honour’ ahead of knighthood

David Beckham is expected to receive a knighthood in King Charles' Birthday Honours, becoming the 16th male footballer to be awarded the title.But before that momentous occasion, the football legend has issued a kind of birthday honour of...

Iran, Israel exchange missiles, drone strikes in latest escalation

Iran and Israel have exchanged ballistic missiles and drone strikes in the latest escalation between the two longtime foes, continuing attacks as the international community hopes for the situation to de-escalate.  In its barrage of strikes on Saturday, the...

Bill O’Reilly Column: The last days of Tehran

It is likely over for the Islamic terrorists in Iran but they don't know it yet.  The Israeli Air Force was able to bomb multiple sites in that country without resistance.  The Iranian air defense system does not...

Enjoy exclusive access to all of our content

Get an online subscription and you can unlock any article you come across.